|
| |

|
|
|
 |
GOOD
TO GREAT |
|
|
BY JIM COLLINS |
|

Available also as an executive summary
from Soundview.
Click Here
|
|
|
From the Publisher |
| |
|
The Challenge
Built to Last, the defining management study of the nineties, showed
how great companies triumph over time and how long-term sustained
performance can be engineered into the DNA of an enterprise from the
very beginning.
But what about the company that is not born with great DNA? How can
good companies, mediocre companies, even bad companies achieve enduring
greatness?
The Study
For years, this question preyed on the mind of Jim Collins. Are there
companies that defy gravity and convert long-term mediocrity or worse
into long-term superiority? And if so, what are the universal
distinguishing characteristics that cause a company to go from good to
great?
The Standards
Using tough benchmarks, Collins and his research team identified a
set of elite companies that made the leap to great results and sustained
those results for at least fifteen years. How great? After the leap, the
good-to-great companies generated cumulative stock returns that beat the
general stock market by an average of seven times in fifteen years,
better than twice the results delivered by a composite index of the
worldÕs greatest companies, including Coca-Cola, Intel, General
Electric, and Merck.

The Comparisons
The research team contrasted the good-to-great companies with a
carefully selected set of comparison companies that failed to make the
leap from good to great. What was different? Why did one set of
companies become truly great performers while the other set remained
only good?
Over five years, the team analyzed the histories of all twenty-eight
companies in the study. After sifting through mountains of data and
thousands of pages of interviews, Collins and his crew discovered the
key determinants of greatness why some companies make the leap and
others don't.
The Findings
The findings of the Good to Great study will surprise many
readers and shed light on virtually every area of management strategy
and practice. The findings include:
 | Level 5 Leaders: The research team was shocked to discover the
type of leadership required to achieve greatness. |
 | The Hedgehog Concept (Simplicity within the Three Circles): To go
from good to great requires transcending the curse of competence.
|
 | A Culture of Discipline: When you combine a culture of discipline
with an ethic of entrepreneurship, you get the magical alchemy of
great results. |
 | Technology Accelerators: Good-to-great companies think differently
about the role of technology. |
 | The Flywheel and the Doom Loop: Those who launch radical change
programs and wrenching restructurings will almost certainly fail to
make the leap. |
Some of the key concepts discerned in the study, comments Jim
Collins, "fly in the face of our modern business culture and will, quite
frankly, upset some people. Perhaps, but who can afford to ignore these
findings?
 |
| |
Synopsis |
| |
|
The findings of the Good to Great study will
surprise many readers and shed light on virtually every area of
management strategy and practice. The findings include:
 | Level 5 Leaders: The research team was shocked to discover
the type of leadership required to achieve greatness. |
 | The Hedgehog Concept (Simplicity within the Three Circles):
To go from good to great requires transcending the curse of
competence. |
 | A Culture of Discipline: When you combine a culture of
discipline with an ethic of entrepreneurship, you get the magical
alchemy of great results. Technology |
 | Accelerators: Good-to-great companies think differently
about the role of technology. |
 | The Flywheel and the Doom Loop: Those who launch radical
change programs and wrenching restructurings will almost certainly
fail to make the leap. |

|
| |
From The Critics |
| |
|
Publishers Weekly
In what Collins terms a prequel to the bestseller Built to Last he wrote
with Jerry Porras, this worthwhile effort explores the way good
organizations can be turned into ones that produce great, sustained
results. To find the keys to greatness, Collins's 21-person research
team (at his management research firm) read and coded 6,000 articles,
generated more than 2,000 pages of interview transcripts and created 384
megabytes of computer data in a five-year project. That Collins is able
to distill the findings into a cogent, well-argued and instructive guide
is a testament to his writing skills. After establishing a definition of
a good-to-great transition that involves a 10-year fallow period
followed by 15 years of increased profits, Collins's crew combed through
every company that has made the Fortune 500 (approximately 1,400) and
found 11 that met their criteria, including Walgreens, Kimberly Clark
and Circuit City. At the heart of the findings about these companies'
stellar successes is what Collins calls the Hedgehog Concept, a product
or service that leads a company to outshine all worldwide competitors,
that drives a company's economic engine and that a company is passionate
about. While the companies that achieved greatness were all in different
industries, each engaged in versions of Collins's strategies. While some
of the overall findings are counterintuitive (e.g., the most effective
leaders are humble and strong-willed rather than outgoing), many of
Collins's perspectives on running a business are amazingly simple and
commonsense. This is not to suggest, however, that executives at all
levels wouldn't benefit from reading this book; after all, only 11
companies managed to figureout how to change their B grade to an A on
their own. (Oct.) Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information.

Soundview Executive Book Summaries
In his previous bestseller, Built to Last, Jim Collins explored
what made great companies great and how they sustained that greatness
over time. One point kept nagging him, though - great companies have,
for the most part, always been great, while a vast majority of good
companies remain just that: good, but not great. What could merely good
companies do to become great, to turn long-term weakness into long-term
supremacy?
Collins and his team of researchers used strict benchmarks to
identify a group of 11 elite companies that made the leap from good to
great and sustained that greatness for at least 15 years. The real
surprise of Good to Great is not so much what good companies do to
propel themselves to greatness - it is why more companies have not done
the same things more often.
The author and his team of researchers established these
good-to-great benchmarks:
 | The companies had to have experienced 15-year cumulative stock
returns that were at or below the general stock market, punctuated by
a transition point, then cumulative returns at least three times the
market over the next fifteen years. |
 | Each company had to demonstrate the good-to-great pattern
independent of its industry. |
 | Each company had to demonstrate a pattern of results.
|
 | Each company was compared to other similar companies that either
never made the good-to-great leap (or made it but did not sustain it),
in order to determine what distinguished the good-to-great company
from all others. |
When the dust cleared and the good-to-great companies were
identified, the author and his researchers found distinct patterns of
behavior in those who led each company and the people who followed them
- patterns that concerned disciplined people, thought and action.
Level 5 Leadership
One of the most surprising results of the research was in the discovery
of the type of leadership required to turn a good company into a great
one. One might think that such companies are led by high-profile leaders
with big personalities who make headlines and become celebrities.
Yet, Collins found that those leaders who seek and thrive in the
spotlight do not exude what can be termed "Level 5 Leadership"
behaviors. (The term Level 5 refers to the highest level in a hierarchy
of executive capabilities.) Leaders of this type -those who combine
extreme personal humility with intense professional will - shun the
attention of celebrity, channeling their ambition toward the goal of
building a great company. Collins explains that these leaders all set up
successors for success, are compellingly modest, and have unwavering
resolve.
He also found that good-to-great leaders understand three simple
truths:
- If you begin with the "who," rather than the "what," you can more
easily adapt to a changing world.
- If you have the right people on the bus, the problem of how to
motivate and manage people largely goes away.
- If you have the wrong people, it doesn't matter whether you
discover the right direction - you still won't have a great company.
All good-to-great companies began the process of finding a path to
greatness by confronting the brutal facts of their current reality.
Collins found that when a company starts with an honest and diligent
effort to determine the truth of its situation, the right decisions
often become self-evident.
One of the primary tasks in taking a company from good to great is to
create a culture wherein people have a tremendous opportunity to be
heard and, ultimately, for the truth to be likewise heard. Collins
writes that, to create a culture of discipline, successful leaders:
 | Build a culture around the idea of freedom and responsibility,
within a framework. |
 | Fill the company's culture with self-disciplined people who are
willing to go to extreme lengths to fulfill their responsibilities.
|
 | Do not confuse a culture of discipline with a tyrannical
discipline. |
Collins also found that good-to-great organizations think differently
than mediocre organizations about technology and technological change.
They avoid the fads and bandwagons that typically arise from new
technology, instead becoming pioneers in the application of carefully
selected technologies. Leaders of good-to-great companies respond with
thoughtfulness and creativity, driven by a compulsion to turn unrealized
potential into results. They act in terms of what they want to create,
and how to improve their companies, relative to an absolute standard of
excellence.
Good-to-great transformations often look like dramatic, revolutionary
events to those observing from the outside, but they feel like organic,
cumulative processes to people on the inside. Collins writes that
good-to-great companies had no name for their transformations; there was
no launch event, no tag line, no programmatic feel whatsoever. Collins
explains that each company went through a quiet, deliberate process of
figuring out what needed to be done to create the best future results,
then simply took those steps, one by one over time, until it hit
breakthrough moments.
Why Soundview Likes This Book
Collins has taken exemplary research and turned it into a book that
redefines what it takes to become a great company. His eye-opening
insights and sharp historical perspective support the valid and
important conclusions he reaches. By debunking many myths about what it
takes to make a company succeed, he points leaders in the right
direction to turn competence into excellence. Copyright (c) 2002
Soundview Executive Book Summaries
 |
|
|
|
searchwords: Jim Collins Colins,
James Collins, Good to Great, Good and Great, Jim Collins books,
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORDER THE BOOK |
|
|
|